Category Archives: Apparent authority

D.P.R.: No justification shown for search of def’s vehicle during a traffic stop

Defendant was ordered out of his vehicle during a traffic stop, but there were no grounds to search it, starting with a cigarette pack. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Ramos-Rios, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102516 (D. P.R. June … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.P.R.: No justification shown for search of def’s vehicle during a traffic stop

OH1: Apparent authority shown for third party consent to search of def’s bedroom

Consent was granted by someone the police reasonably believed had apparent authority to consent to a search of defendant’s bedroom [no facts given to see how there’s third party consent to a bedroom, so this is immediately suspect]. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on OH1: Apparent authority shown for third party consent to search of def’s bedroom

RI: No apparent authority to consent shown; police merely assumed consenter lived there, but she didn’t

The person asked for consent didn’t live there, and the officers made no attempt to find out whether she did. They just assumed she did. The state’s alternative argument of exigency is rejected because the officers never testified to any … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on RI: No apparent authority to consent shown; police merely assumed consenter lived there, but she didn’t

GA: Def’s visiting cousin with no key had no apparent authority to consent to search of house

Defendant’s cousin, visiting the house and working in the garage, had no apparent authority to consent to an entry. He made it clear it wasn’t his house, that he had no key and entered through an unlocked side door, and … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on GA: Def’s visiting cousin with no key had no apparent authority to consent to search of house

E.D.Tenn.: Householder had no apparent authority to consent to a search of a metal box she identified as somebody else’s

Householder’s consent did not apply to a search of a metal box the householder said belonged to someone else. “While it is undisputed that the officers had authority to search Cuff’s residence based on her consent, the Court finds that … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Householder had no apparent authority to consent to a search of a metal box she identified as somebody else’s

OH2: Mistaken entry of LPN into computer that resulted in erroneous stop still made the stop reasonable

The Ohio officer entered in the license number of an Illinois vehicle but omitted a letter in smaller type on the side that made the number complete because he didn’t know it was required. The wrong LPN came back as … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH2: Mistaken entry of LPN into computer that resulted in erroneous stop still made the stop reasonable

MT: Def was driving parents’ car and they had equal or superior authority to consent to its search

Defendant, a known drug user and suspected dealer, was driving his parents’ car, and they gave consent to search it. “Miller had permission from his parents to use the vehicle and thus had common, if not superior, authority to Baty … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on MT: Def was driving parents’ car and they had equal or superior authority to consent to its search

MO: Homeowner had apparent authority to consent to search his basement where def had been living for 12 days

Police were investigating the defendant for child pornography, and located him at a friend’s house where he’d been living in the basement for 12 days. Because of the layout of the basement and its access, the court finds that the … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on MO: Homeowner had apparent authority to consent to search his basement where def had been living for 12 days

M.D.La.: When multiple people with apparent authority are present, just one can consent

When multiple people with apparent authority are present, any one of them can consent. Here, the credible evidence shows that three did. Defendant’s Randolph argument is rejected. United States v. Bourgeois, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18927 (M.D. La. Feb. 9, … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on M.D.La.: When multiple people with apparent authority are present, just one can consent

D.Nev.: No actual or apparent authority to consent shown; presence of gun in motel room not exigency per se

Actual authority to consent and apparent authority in a motel room are two different things. Here, the government can’t show either on this record. The possibility of a gun in the room is not an exigent circumstance. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Emergency / exigency, Inventory | Comments Off on D.Nev.: No actual or apparent authority to consent shown; presence of gun in motel room not exigency per se

NM: No proof of common authority for consent by an occasional visitor; state doesn’t recognize apparent authority

The evidence did not show the consenter had common authority, and New Mexico does not recognize apparent authority. The exception for protective sweep and the community caretaking function also didn’t apply because there was no bona fide need for either. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NM: No proof of common authority for consent by an occasional visitor; state doesn’t recognize apparent authority

CA8: Smell of MJ from car was PC

Defendant was stopped for no license plate and weaving. When the window came down, the smell of marijuana was apparent. The driver appeared under the influence. The passenger became agitated, and that confirmed to the officer he was too. A … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA8: Smell of MJ from car was PC

D.Me.: Third party consenter’s apparent authority included the attic

“Contrary to Defendant’s argument, Ms. Barry had common authority over the property. She lived in the home with Defendant and their minor child, and shared a bedroom with Defendant. Consistent with the fact she resided in the home and had … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Me.: Third party consenter’s apparent authority included the attic

LA5: Adult grandson lived with grandmother; she could consent to his room because he didn’t pay rent

Defendant lived with his grandmother, but he didn’t pay rent. He was arrested and taken away, and she consented to a search of his room. “[T]he consenting party, Ms. Gant, was the sole owner of the property subject to the … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on LA5: Adult grandson lived with grandmother; she could consent to his room because he didn’t pay rent

CA9: How can a mere visitor have apparent authority to consent to search premises? She can’t

The District Court clearly erred in crediting that a mere visitor had apparent authority to consent to a search of a house. United States v. Chavez, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 23301 (9th Cir. Dec. 27, 2016):

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on CA9: How can a mere visitor have apparent authority to consent to search premises? She can’t

W.D.Mo.: Officers could rely on hotel manager’s apparent authority to consent to opening work locker

Defendant had a limited reasonable expectation of privacy in his hotel work locker and its contents, and officers got the manager to open it. It was reasonable for the officers to believe that the hotel manager had apparent authority over … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Officers could rely on hotel manager’s apparent authority to consent to opening work locker

MO: Reliance on apparent authority was objectively reasonable

It was objectively reasonable for the officer to believe the officer’s testimony that the officers had apparent authority to enter the basement area where defendant was staying. “Defendant argues on appeal that Ms. Latcher did not reside in the home … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MO: Reliance on apparent authority was objectively reasonable

CA9: Arrest for any offense will do as long as there were facts for some offense

Following Devenpeck v. Alford, 543 U.S. 146, 153 (2004), “an officer’s ‘subjective reason for making the arrest need not be the criminal offense as to which the known facts provide probable cause.’” Brincken v. Voss, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 21101 … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: Arrest for any offense will do as long as there were facts for some offense

UT: Roommates had apparent authority to consent to search of a room they seldom entered, but they could, and that’s the point

The state had two justifications for the entry. First, the other occupants had the ability to consent to entry into the room even though they didn’t regularly go there. Second, blood on the floor showed exigency. Met v. State, 2016 … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on UT: Roommates had apparent authority to consent to search of a room they seldom entered, but they could, and that’s the point

N.D.Ga.: Landlord had apparent authority to consent because of writ of possession

Defendant’s landlord had a writ of possession from a state court and had evicted him from the premises. He called the police and the police saw the writ of possession, and they had no reason to question it. The court … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Landlord had apparent authority to consent because of writ of possession