Category Archives: Reasonable expectation of privacy

WaPo: Volokh Conspiracy: Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review

WaPo: Volokh Conspiracy: Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review by Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz: On March 3, at 10 a.m., the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Los Angeles v. Patel, a fascinating case about the … Continue reading →

Posted in Informational privacy, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Volokh Conspiracy: Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review

D.Vt.: Def had no REP by giving a load of MJ to a driver to take to him in another state

Defendant packed marijuana in a trailer and entrusted it to a driver to take it to him in Vermont. The trailer was stopped in Illinois, subjected to a dog sniff, and the marijuana was found. The driver agreed to continue … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.Vt.: Def had no REP by giving a load of MJ to a driver to take to him in another state

PA decision that CI’s recording inside a house required a warrant affirmed by equally divided court

In 2013, Pennsylvania Superior Court held that the state constitution prohibits warrantless taping inside a suspect’s home with a video camera planted on an informant. Commonwealth v. Dunnavant, 2013 PA Super 38, 63 A.3d 1252 (2013) (posted here). That decision … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on PA decision that CI’s recording inside a house required a warrant affirmed by equally divided court

No REP in peer-to-peer file sharing. Yes, that issue is still raised

Defendant’s computer was on the Gnutella peer-to-peer network. The police went in and found 1571 files for sharing and did a software driven search and found child porn on some of them. A week later they went back and found … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on No REP in peer-to-peer file sharing. Yes, that issue is still raised

LA3: Invited in CI videoing drug transaction is not Fourth Amendment violation

There is no constitutional impediment to a wired CI coming into the defendant’s house to video record a drug transaction. He was invited in. State v. Montgomery, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2974 (La. App. 3 Cir. December 17, 2014). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on LA3: Invited in CI videoing drug transaction is not Fourth Amendment violation

MO holds overstaying hotel rental period waiver of REP

Defendant paid for a room at a hotel through 11/7. On 11/8 he was still there and hadn’t paid. Hotel security went to the room, unlocked it, and the inside latch was locked. The door opened only two inches. Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MO holds overstaying hotel rental period waiver of REP

WaPo: Volokh: Two district courts adopt the mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment

WaPo: Volokh: Two district courts adopt the mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment by Orin Kerr: Regular readers will recall the mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment introduced by the DC Circuit in United States v. Maynard, by which law … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Volokh: Two district courts adopt the mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment

D.N.J.: No REP in a burner phone def didn’t claim he used and wasn’t subscribed to anybody

This defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy in somebody else’s cell phone or the records of its use. He never used it or claimed any interest in it. He also lacks any standing in an unsubscribed burner phone. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.J.: No REP in a burner phone def didn’t claim he used and wasn’t subscribed to anybody

N.D.W.Va.: Lesser expectation of privacy in a commercial dumpster than in a residential one

There is a lesser expectation of privacy in a commercial dumpster than in a residential one. Affirmative steps must be taken to lock it up and bar others. United States v. Skruck, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167952 (N.D. W.Va. December … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Lesser expectation of privacy in a commercial dumpster than in a residential one

NPR: NOLA Police Hope Body Cameras Provide Important Evidence

NPR: NOLA Police Hope Body Cameras Provide Important Evidence: Police officers in New Orleans started wearing cameras this spring. Independent police monitor Susan Hutson tells NPR’s Scott Simon how the NOPD’s camera implementation is going.

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NPR: NOLA Police Hope Body Cameras Provide Important Evidence

W.D.N.Y.: SW for dumpsters here didn’t violate “business curtilage” nor a REP

A search warrant was issued for dumpsters on a “large commercial property” for evidence of asbestos dumping in violation of EPA law. Accepting that there might be a “business curtilage,” the court finds this search warrant didn’t violate any reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: SW for dumpsters here didn’t violate “business curtilage” nor a REP

The Atlantic: Seen It All Before: 10 Predictions About Police Body Cameras

The Atlantic: Seen It All Before: 10 Predictions About Police Body Cameras by Robinson Meyer: Twenty years ago, law enforcement and activists teamed up to support another video surveillance technology: in-car dash cams.

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on The Atlantic: Seen It All Before: 10 Predictions About Police Body Cameras

AK: The exclusionary rule does not apply in DL suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience

The exclusionary rule does not apply in drivers license suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience. Here, it’s not. Garibay v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles, 2014 Alas. LEXIS 222 (November 28, 2014). … Continue reading →

Posted in Due process, Exclusionary rule, Informational privacy, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: The exclusionary rule does not apply in DL suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience

WaPo: Maker of smartphone spying app pleads guilty in federal court

WaPo: Maker of smartphone spying app pleads guilty in federal court by Matt Zapotosky: The maker of a smartphone app once marketed to help catch cheating lovers by listening in on phone calls and tracking locations was ordered Tuesday to … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Maker of smartphone spying app pleads guilty in federal court

HuffPo: Apparent Drug Deal Goes Down During Live Local News Broadcast

HuffPo: Apparent Drug Deal Goes Down During Live Local News Broadcast by Jackson Connor

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on HuffPo: Apparent Drug Deal Goes Down During Live Local News Broadcast

NYTimes: Mail Monitoring Rarely Denied, Postal Service Says

NYTimes: Mail Monitoring Rarely Denied, Postal Service Says by Ron Nixon: The United States Postal Service granted almost all of the nearly 6,700 requests from law enforcement agencies last year to monitor the mail of Americans for use in criminal … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NYTimes: Mail Monitoring Rarely Denied, Postal Service Says

D.Conn.: No reasonable expectation of privacy in the back of a police car when defs alone talk to each other

Two defendants were arrested and left alone in the back of a police car, and, as hoped, they talked about the crime they were arrested for, and it was surreptitiously recorded. They may have had a subjective expectation of privacy … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Conn.: No reasonable expectation of privacy in the back of a police car when defs alone talk to each other

D.Minn.: There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in goods in a box opened for sale in a store

In a counterfeit sports jersey case, the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a box he opened and put on the counter of a store to sell. United States v. Gore, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160497 (D. Minn. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in goods in a box opened for sale in a store

OH3: There is a reasonable expectation of privacy in medical records; SW required

There is a reasonable expectation of privacy in medical records under Ferguson supported by McNeely. While statute may waive doctor-patient privilege, it does not waive the reasonable expectation of privacy. State v. Little, 2014-Ohio-4871, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 4743 (3d … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OH3: There is a reasonable expectation of privacy in medical records; SW required

National Constitution Center: Before the NSA, there was the USPS

National Constitution Center: Before the NSA, there was the USPS by Nicandro Iannacci: According to the USPS Office of Inspector General, 20 percent of law enforcement requests were not properly approved, and 13 percent were unjustified or not properly documented. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on National Constitution Center: Before the NSA, there was the USPS