N.D.W.Va.: Lesser expectation of privacy in a commercial dumpster than in a residential one

There is a lesser expectation of privacy in a commercial dumpster than in a residential one. Affirmative steps must be taken to lock it up and bar others. United States v. Skruck, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167952 (N.D. W.Va. December 4, 2014), R&R 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168917 (N.D. W.Va. November 20, 2014) (see this post from two days ago form W.D.N.Y.).

Arizona law gave the defendant deputy sheriff broad authority to book or release for possession of a weapon. The jury found that his exercise of discretion here to book was reasonable based on various factors. The evidence supported the finding of reasonableness. Harvey v. County of Navajo, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22821 (9th Cir. December 4, 2014).*

A call to a domestic disturbance led to a seizure of guns. The officers had reason to believe they were invited to enter and talk about it, and the defense had no evidence to the contrary. United States v. Aquallo, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168191 (D.S.D. November 26, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.