D.Mass.: No discovery of covert Shapchat accounts for lack of materiality

Officers set up covert Snapchat accounts to communicate with defendant. He’s not entitled to discovery about that for Brady or Franks purposes because he can’t show materiality. United States v. Stroup, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132483 (D. Mass. July 26, 2024).* [At bottom, where’s the reasonable expectation of privacy in a viewable Shapchat account?]

Petitioner’s guilty plea waived his Fourth Amendment claim so it couldn’t be raised in a 2255. Thirkill v. United States, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 18272 (6th Cir. July 24, 2024).*

“In arguing that Detective Gillilan did not have reasonable suspicion to investigate the package, Sherrell faces a steep climb from the outset. When a CI provides specific information that is confirmed upon investigation, it is a strong indication of reliability and often justifies reasonable suspicion. … This is true even if the CI has not always been reliable or even if the CI provided only partially accurate information about the events at issue. … And we have held that many of the other indicators of criminal activity that are present here will support an officer’s reasonable suspicion.” United States v. Sherrell, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 18287 (6th Cir. July 24, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Social media warrants, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.