Daily Archives: April 9, 2024

OH5: A replevin action can’t be used to suppress evidence seized by SW

A replevin action can’t be used to suppress evidence seized by search warrant. Glass v. Del. Cty. Sheriff’s Office, 2024-Ohio-1301, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 1235 (5th Dist. Apr. 4, 2024). Defendant fails his Franks burden, and the warrant wasn’t stale. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Independent source, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH5: A replevin action can’t be used to suppress evidence seized by SW

CA7: Not following state and local laws on strip searches doesn’t make one unreasonable

“Shaw raises three responses, but they are unavailing. First, he contends that the officers did not follow Wisconsin and local laws that instruct officers to obtain written authorization from a supervisor before a strip search. But a violation of state … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Stop and frisk, Strip search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA7: Not following state and local laws on strip searches doesn’t make one unreasonable

techdirt: Court Calls Out BS ‘Driving While Black’ Traffic Stops While Tossing Felony Possession Conviction

techdirt: Court Calls Out BS ‘Driving While Black’ Traffic Stops While Tossing Felony Possession Conviction by Tim Cushing:

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on techdirt: Court Calls Out BS ‘Driving While Black’ Traffic Stops While Tossing Felony Possession Conviction

MI: Pants seized incident to arrest can be forensically tested without a SW

Defendant’s pants were seized incident to his arrest for murder because there was apparent blood on them. They were subject to being forensically tested without a separate warrant. Any reasonable expectation of privacy was lost with the seizure. People v. … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Search incident | Comments Off on MI: Pants seized incident to arrest can be forensically tested without a SW