DE: Cell tower dump was reasonable under 4A

Defendant was convicted of robbery and kidnapping of a woman from her apartment complex to go to her ATM machine. Police got cell tower dumps for the nearest towers to the occurrence at the specific times to locate cell phones potentially involved at her apartment and the ATM. That narrowed the phone down to defendant. The court finds “cell tower dumps” constitutional under Carpenter. The affidavits and warrants showed probable cause and particularity. Hudson v. State, 2024 Del. LEXIS 13 (Jan. 9, 2024).

The state post-conviction court decided the ineffective assistance of counsel on the merits of the search as well. That was preclusive of federal habeas because it was not an unreasonable application of federal law. Askew v. Sec’y, Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3316 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 8, 2024)* (Stone not even cited.)

Defendant’s encounter with the officer here was voluntary and not a seizure. Even the officer’s getting into defendant’s bag was limited and by consent. The R&R is rejected, and the motion to suppress should be denied. United States v. Jumping Eagle, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3613 (D.S.D. Jan. 4, 2024),* rejecting 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232352 (D.S.D. Nov. 21, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.