Category Archives: Seizure

OH11: Consent to search a purse is consent to search a wallet inside

Consent to search a purse is consent to search a wallet in the purse. State v. Korb, 2014-Ohio-4543, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 4449 (11th Dist. October 14, 2014). “Because White did not clearly, unambiguously, or unequivocally re-assert his right to … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Seizure | Comments Off on OH11: Consent to search a purse is consent to search a wallet inside

M.D.La.: Year long seizure of a hard drive without getting a warrant was unreasonable

A computer tech was hired to transfer information from an old hard drive to a new computer in 2007, and he stumbled upon child pornography and called the FBI. They met, and he brought the hard drive. Defendant’s email address … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Reasonableness, Seizure, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Year long seizure of a hard drive without getting a warrant was unreasonable

OR: Just asking for ID wasn’t a “stop” without more

On its third review of this case, having gone up twice, the court concludes that asking for defendant’s ID under the circumstances here was not a “stop” that required reasonable suspicion or probable cause when compared with other cases. All … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OR: Just asking for ID wasn’t a “stop” without more

WaPo: Activists and Hill staffers meet to discuss curbs to asset-forfeiture laws

WaPo: Activists and Hill staffers meet to discuss curbs to asset-forfeiture laws by Robert O’Harrow Jr.: Two dozen civil liberties activists, legal specialists and Capitol Hill staffers from across the political spectrum convened Thursday to discuss reforms for civil asset-forfeiture … Continue reading →

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Seizure | Comments Off on WaPo: Activists and Hill staffers meet to discuss curbs to asset-forfeiture laws

OH9: Officers walking up on both sides of a parked vehicle wasn’t a “stop”

Two officers walked up on an already parked vehicle, one on each side. The officer testified that he’d be “pretty upset” if the defendant drove off, but he was actually free to leave. Therefore, it was not a stop, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on OH9: Officers walking up on both sides of a parked vehicle wasn’t a “stop”

KY: 2 am knock-and-talk based on tip was suppressed where tip quickly proved wrong

2 a.m. knock and talk based on midnight anonymous call about noxious odors from the property was invalid where the officers approaching smelled nothing. “Upon receipt of the anonymous tip, the police had a duty to respond and investigate to … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Knock and talk, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on KY: 2 am knock-and-talk based on tip was suppressed where tip quickly proved wrong

CA11: Suspicionless parole searches of cell phone and home here were proper

The parole search of defendant’s home and cell phone was permitted by Samson. He’d signed a parole search waiver that permitted a search at any time. Also, the officers had reasonable suspicion, but Samson doesn’t require that if the parolee … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Suspicionless parole searches of cell phone and home here were proper

MT: Talking control of DL is a seizure when they are carried to the patrol car

The officer’s taking control of defendant’s and the passenger’s driver’s license was a seizure of them when he took the DLs back to the patrol car to run them. They were not free to leave. State v. Strom, 2014 MT … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on MT: Talking control of DL is a seizure when they are carried to the patrol car