Category Archives: Inevitable discovery

OR: State’s inevitable discovery argument was speculative and rejected

The state’s argument that the finding of a used syringe and a “cooker” on him would have been found lawfully anyway during a patdown was based on speculation the court can’t accept. State v. Sigfridson, 287 Ore. App. 74, 2017 … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on OR: State’s inevitable discovery argument was speculative and rejected

NY3: Def’s live-in girlfriend shared premises and had apparent authority to consent

Defendant’s girlfriend with whom he lived had apparent authority to consent to a search of their joint premises. People v. Gray, 2017 NY Slip Op 05873, 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5809 (3d Dept. July 27, 2017).* There were two … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on NY3: Def’s live-in girlfriend shared premises and had apparent authority to consent

IL: Because def’s car matched description of a stolen car, it was reasonable to handcuff def

Considering that the vehicle defendant was stopped in matched the description of a stolen car, it was reasonable for the officer to handcuff him. People v. Richardson, 2017 IL App (1st) 130203-B, 2017 Ill. App. LEXIS 314 (May 12, 2017). … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Because def’s car matched description of a stolen car, it was reasonable to handcuff def

CA4: Inventory would happen so that’s inevitable discovery

The discovery of the contraband was by inevitable discovery because an inventory was going to occur in any event. The fact the policy wasn’t written isn’t determinative as long as it is reasonable. United States v. Bullette, 2017 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory | Comments Off on CA4: Inventory would happen so that’s inevitable discovery

CA11: No nexus shown for cell phone SW, but def was on probation, so inevitable discovery applies

Cell phone search warrant failed to show nexus between the phone and the alleged crime. In considering remedy, the court decides not to apply the good faith exception and instead goes with inevitable discovery. Defendant was on probation and there … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Inevitable discovery, Nexus | Comments Off on CA11: No nexus shown for cell phone SW, but def was on probation, so inevitable discovery applies

Cal.2d: Sandra Bullock’s stalker’s home search remains suppressed

Defendant was Sandra Bullock’s stalker arrested in her house. He lawyered up but the police kept questioning and got consent which was held involuntary by the trial court. The state appealed. They tried inevitable discovery, and that was rejected. Finally, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on Cal.2d: Sandra Bullock’s stalker’s home search remains suppressed

NY4: Search of cell phone for texts led to SW; not inevitable discovery because SW sought because of illegal search

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights in his cell phone text messages were violated by the police searching them without a warrant. The fact they got a warrant later didn’t help them because that was the only reason to search the phone, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Inevitable discovery, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY4: Search of cell phone for texts led to SW; not inevitable discovery because SW sought because of illegal search

LA5: PC developed in lengthy investigation excused lack of SW by inevitable discovery

It wasn’t reasonable for the police to believe that defendant’s father had apparent authority to consent to a search of locked box. However, inevitable discovery applies because the investigation was well underway, and there was probable cause for a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on LA5: PC developed in lengthy investigation excused lack of SW by inevitable discovery

W.D.Ky.: Frisk was without RS, but computer check showed outstanding arrest warrant, so inevitable discovery applies

“In sum, at the time Browning decided to conduct a Terry pat-down of James’ outer clothing, he was faced with a suspect that (1) was present in a high-crime area, (2) was, by his own admission, recently released from prison … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Frisk was without RS, but computer check showed outstanding arrest warrant, so inevitable discovery applies

A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: Seizing cell phone before search authorization was granted was inevitable discovery

Based on a female airman’s complaint, AFOSI developed information that defendant had sex with her when she was too intoxicated to consent. She believed that he had pictures on his cell phone. OSI was seeking a search authorization for his … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: Seizing cell phone before search authorization was granted was inevitable discovery

OH5: SW for drug transaction evidence on computer reasonably led to finding CP

The computer search warrant in this case was for evidence of drug activity (as in pictures and Excel spreadsheets or other ledger information), and the officer stumbled upon child pornography. The fact files can be hidden or deliberately mislabeled necessarily … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on OH5: SW for drug transaction evidence on computer reasonably led to finding CP

FL2: Fireman reported to LEO that he saw drugs in house; police entry couldn’t rely on inevitable discovery where no effort to get warrant

A fire happened at defendant’s house, and the firefighters put it out. They saw some drugs and drug paraphernalia in the garage and told the police. On resweeping the house yet a second time for no apparent reason other than … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on FL2: Fireman reported to LEO that he saw drugs in house; police entry couldn’t rely on inevitable discovery where no effort to get warrant

UT: State failed to prove inevitable discovery after warrantless entry into home investigating hit and run accident

Two police officers went to defendant’s home because the LPN on the car involved in a hit and run came back to that address. At the house, the housekeeper greeted them and said that defendant probably was driving the car. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on UT: State failed to prove inevitable discovery after warrantless entry into home investigating hit and run accident

D.N.J.: Inevitable discovery applied: (1) officers were drafting affidavit for warrant and (2) there was overwhelming PC

The government proved inevitable discovery applied because (1) they had already started drafting the warrant when the allegedly illegal search occurred and (2) there was overwhelming probable cause for the search. United States v. Restitullo, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144269 … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Inevitable discovery applied: (1) officers were drafting affidavit for warrant and (2) there was overwhelming PC

DC: Inevitable discovery applied to cell phone search in 2002 rather than GFE

Inevitable discovery used to justify a search of a cell phone in 2002 because it might have been unreasonable under Riley from 2014 (no mention of good faith exception applied to pre-Riley searches). Logan v. United States, 2016 D.C. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on DC: Inevitable discovery applied to cell phone search in 2002 rather than GFE

CA7: Inevitable discovery doesn’t apply to DNA blood draw [via a habeas appeal]

The Seventh Circuit here dealt with a Fourth Amendment IAC claim. The court dealt with the Fourth Amendment merits, which was far easier, rather than get into the complexity of Stone v. Powell deterrence issue under a § 2254 claim. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA7: Inevitable discovery doesn’t apply to DNA blood draw [via a habeas appeal]

DC: That govt could have gotten a SW isn’t enough for inevitable discovery

Defendant’s admission that she “trashed” defendant’s stuff and it was in her hotel room was probable cause to believe there was evidence of a crime, but there was no exigency for a warrantless entry. Simply arguing that the government could … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on DC: That govt could have gotten a SW isn’t enough for inevitable discovery

E.D.Mich.: Detailed tip about def coupled with seeing bulge of a gun was RS

Aside from the detailed tip the police had about defendant, the officer saw the bulge of a gun, and that was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Bridges, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95367 (E.D.Mich. July 21, 2016).* Defendant’s patdown at the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Detailed tip about def coupled with seeing bulge of a gun was RS

CA6: The govt fails on its burden on independent source after an illegal search; deterrence rationale of exclusionary rule applies

The police conducted an illegal search then got a search warrant. The District Court suppressed, and the Sixth Circuit affirms finding the government did not satisfy the independent source rule. Moreover, it finds the deterrence rationale of the exclusionary rule … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA6: The govt fails on its burden on independent source after an illegal search; deterrence rationale of exclusionary rule applies

WI S.Ct. decides inevitable discovery for first time and it overcomes a statement obtained in bad faith

Wisconsin Supreme Court decides the inevitable discovery rule for the first time. Despite officer’s bad faith in obtaining a statement without proper Miranda warnings, the evidence is clear to the Supreme Court that the search would have occurred without statement. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on WI S.Ct. decides inevitable discovery for first time and it overcomes a statement obtained in bad faith