Category Archives: DNA

CT: 1986 consent to DNA sample didn’t bar 2009 retesting

Defendant’s consent to a DNA test in 1986 did not preclude a 2009 retest of the sample after technology improved. State v. Benefield, 2014 Conn. App. LEXIS 468 (November 18, 2014). Based on a lot of information, including wiretaps, trash … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, DNA | Comments Off on CT: 1986 consent to DNA sample didn’t bar 2009 retesting

VI: DNA request 15 months later wasn’t stale, but it was speculative and denied

There was no probable cause for obtaining a buccal swab for DNA 15 months after defendant’s arrest to attempt to link him to a gun. The best that the officers could say was that there may be trace evidence that … Continue reading

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on VI: DNA request 15 months later wasn’t stale, but it was speculative and denied

D.Minn.: Trace evidence on a firearm justified DNA sample from defendant

A search warrant was properly issued for defendant’s DNA to attempt to link him to firearms found in the take down of a heroin operation. There was probable cause for the warrant and trace evidence was found. In any event, … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, DNA, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Trace evidence on a firearm justified DNA sample from defendant

NC: ABC license permitted search of attached residence accessible directly by a door

Defendant’s home was attached to his liquor store, and ABC officers were permitted under their inspection power to inspect the residence as well which was accessible merely through a door. Inside the residence they could smell marijuana. One room of … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Administrative search, DNA | Comments Off on NC: ABC license permitted search of attached residence accessible directly by a door

IN: SW not needed to test DNA lawfully found during investigation

Defendant was arrested for a murder and DNA was found on his lawfully seized shoe linking him to the crime. A search warrant was not needed to test the DNA already lawfully seized. Guilmette v. State, 2014 Ind. LEXIS 650 … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: SW not needed to test DNA lawfully found during investigation

MD: Consent to an earlier DNA draw to exclude didn’t preclude police keeping the DNA on file

Defendant was a homeless man who consented to a DNA draw to exclude him in a rape investigation, which it did. Later, his DNA was tied to a burglary. His consent to the DNA draw included letting them keep it … Continue reading

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on MD: Consent to an earlier DNA draw to exclude didn’t preclude police keeping the DNA on file

MA: The Fourth Amendment does not prohibit taking a buccal swab for DNA to exclude a fraternal twin in an investigation

The Fourth Amendment does not prohibit taking a buccal swab for DNA to exclude a fraternal twin in an investigation. Commonwealth v. Kostka, 86 Mass. App. Ct. 69 (July 25, 2014):

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on MA: The Fourth Amendment does not prohibit taking a buccal swab for DNA to exclude a fraternal twin in an investigation

VT: Pre-conviction DNA testing of arrestees after arraignment violates the search provision of state constitution

In a comprehensive opinion, the Vermont Supreme Court held Friday that pre-conviction DNA testing of arrestees after arraignment violates the search provision of the Vermont Constitution. It failed every point of analysis. State v. Medina, 2014 VT 69, 2014 Vt. … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, State constitution | Comments Off on VT: Pre-conviction DNA testing of arrestees after arraignment violates the search provision of state constitution

N.D.Ga.: Civil protective order in another case not ground to suppress

Evidence uncovered in a civil case involving the defendant here, plaintiff in that case, was turned over by the defense to the government. Defendant can’t suppress that evidence, even if it was illegally obtained or given in violation of a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, DNA, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Civil protective order in another case not ground to suppress

NY3: No-knock and nighttime search warrant to gather DNA from person is excessive and suppressed

No-knock and nighttime search warrant to gather DNA from person is excessive and suppressed as a violation of the Fourth Amendment. It wasn’t going anywhere. A Yankees cap was left at the scene of a robbery and shooting, and the … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Knock and announce, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY3: No-knock and nighttime search warrant to gather DNA from person is excessive and suppressed