Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

W.D.Ky.: Drug dog immediately on the scene didn’t extend the stop

Because the drug dog got right there, the dog sniff didn’t extend the stop in violation of Rodriguez. United States v. Thorn, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70781 (W.D. Ky. Apr. 26, 2019). Defendant argues that his case was like Rodriguez, … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Drug dog immediately on the scene didn’t extend the stop

E.D.N.C.: Body camera corroborated RS for frisk

“Body camera footage corroborated the detectives’ testimony that the circumstances reasonably suggested Defendant may have been armed and that a pat-down search was needed to ensure officer safety. …. When faced with an uncooperative and seemingly agitated individual suspected of … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Body camera corroborated RS for frisk

WY: New facts after the stop not required if there was RS all along

New facts after the stop are not required to extend the stop, as long as there is reasonable suspicion with the stop. Brown v. State, 2019 WY 42, 2019 Wyo. LEXIS 44 (Apr. 19, 2019). Pre-Carpenter obtaining of CSLI was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: New facts after the stop not required if there was RS all along

E.D.Ky.: RS of drugs doesn’t automatically mean “armed and dangerous”

Reasonable suspicion defendant was involved with drugs does not equate with “armed and dangerous.” Without minimizing the danger weapons would create, it’s a dangerous precedent to go that far just based on officers’ experience. United States v. Gallegos, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: RS of drugs doesn’t automatically mean “armed and dangerous”

E.D.Mo.: CLSI warrant obtained 3½ years before Carpenter was clearly with PC

The CLSI search warrant was obtained 3½ years before Carpenter, and assuming for the sake of argument that a warrant was required. It clearly showed probable cause to get the information. United States v. Johnson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65896 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: CLSI warrant obtained 3½ years before Carpenter was clearly with PC

N.D.Ga.: IP information is not governed by Carpenter

IP information is not governed by Carpenter. “Obtaining information from Kik, Sprint, and Comcast did not allow law enforcement to track Defendant Jenkins’s physical location over an extended period. At most, it allowed them a lead in identifying him — … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: IP information is not governed by Carpenter

N.D.Cal.: Stop for temporary tag was unreasonable because there was no suggestion this one was bogus

Defendant was stopped because of a temporary tag, and the officer had seen bogus temporary tags before. As he approached the car on foot after the stop, it was apparent that the tag was valid. There was no basis for … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Stop for temporary tag was unreasonable because there was no suggestion this one was bogus

D.Vt.: If the arrest is invalid, the search incident is, too

Defendant’s arrest was without probable cause, so the search incident to his arrest must be suppressed. United States v. Williams, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58067 (D. Vt. Apr. 4, 2019).* “Here, many factors formed Detective Deshaies’s objectively reasonable basis to … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Vt.: If the arrest is invalid, the search incident is, too

WI: Exclusionary rule applies to forfeiture actions; remanded for determination of GFE

The exclusionary rule applies to forfeiture actions under 1958 Plymouth Sedan; however, the state gets to argue and develop a record on remand that the good faith exception applies. State v. Scott, 2019 Wisc. App. LEXIS 191 (Apr. 4, 2019). … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Exclusionary rule applies to forfeiture actions; remanded for determination of GFE

M.D.Pa.: State law was more protective than the 4A when the case was in state court, but it doesn’t apply in federal court

While state law was more protective of privacy rights and this case started as a state investigation, state law would not be applied to the motion to suppress the search. Only federal law applies. United States v. Capozzi, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Choice of law, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: State law was more protective than the 4A when the case was in state court, but it doesn’t apply in federal court

Cert. granted: Glover v. Kansas

Cert. granted: Glover v. Kansas, 18-556 Issue: Whether, for purposes of an investigative stop under the Fourth Amendment, it is reasonable for an officer to suspect that the registered owner of a vehicle is the one driving the vehicle absent … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cert. granted: Glover v. Kansas

IA: Multiple hand-to-hand transactions over time was RS

Reasonable suspicion came here from an officer “witnessing what he believed to be a hand-to-hand drug transaction,” and there were “other facts that supported the conclusion they had reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. First, Girsch saw Baker acting suspiciously near … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Multiple hand-to-hand transactions over time was RS

D.S.C.: Byrd on standing in a rental car not retroactively applied to search 7 months before

The officer was diligently pursuing the traffic stop albeit with a mixed motive about defendant being a drug suspect. Under Whren, this was reasonable. Byrd was decided seven months after the stop. Under pre-Byrd law, defendant had no standing, and … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Byrd on standing in a rental car not retroactively applied to search 7 months before

ID: Entry on a writ of execution was reasonable under 4A

A state officer acting on a writ of execution issued by a state court was reasonable. Moreover, plaintiff’s claim is really just a suggestion in a pleading, not in the complaint. Thornton v. Barrett, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53388 (D. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Entry on a writ of execution was reasonable under 4A

CA11: Failure to object to USMJ’s R&R on search claim is waiver for appeal

Defendant waived his suppression motion by not seeking review of the USMJ’s R&R. United States v. Pugh, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 9254 (11th Cir. Mar. 28, 2019). “The Court need not determine whether any of these facts alone would be … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA11: Failure to object to USMJ’s R&R on search claim is waiver for appeal

OH7: No REP in a police interrogation room where def was left with wife with recorder on

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a police interrogation room where defendant was left and was recorded talking to his wife about the shooting. State v. Paige, 2019-Ohio-1088, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 1162 (7th Dist. Mar. 27, 2019) … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH7: No REP in a police interrogation room where def was left with wife with recorder on

PA: “The Fourth Amendment does not have a time limit; it protects individuals from unreasonable seizures, no matter how brief.”

“The Fourth Amendment does not have a time limit; it protects individuals from unreasonable seizures, no matter how brief.” The brief detention here wasn’t based on reasonable suspicion and implicated the Fourth Amendment. Commonwealth v. Adams, 2019 Pa. LEXIS 1734 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on PA: “The Fourth Amendment does not have a time limit; it protects individuals from unreasonable seizures, no matter how brief.”

WA: It’s defendant’s burden to show a seizure occurred

“An appellant making an unconstitutional seizure claim has the burden of proving that a seizure occurred. … [¶] Here, Yang consented to Koster’s entry. Throughout their time in the house, Lucas and Koster told Ho what they were doing. They … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: It’s defendant’s burden to show a seizure occurred

E.D.N.Y.: Def did nothing to show his standing in the car or the things seized from it

Reasonable suspicion supported the stop for no license plate light. Then, defendant lacks a reasonable expectation of privacy in the car or its contents. “However, neither Defendant’s affidavit nor the evidence adduced at the hearing establish that Defendant had any … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def did nothing to show his standing in the car or the things seized from it

E.D.Cal.: Unsealing of SW materials not granted preindictment

The Sacramento Bee and defendant seek unsealing of search warrant materials in an extradition matter, but the motion is denied. Extradition is different than prosecution. If a criminal prosecution will result in the United States, and it still could, the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Unsealing of SW materials not granted preindictment