Category Archives: Prison and jail searches

TN: Uncorroborated anonymous tip insufficient

The anonymous tip in this case was not corroborated, and it was insufficient even under the Tennessee Supreme Court’s 2017 adoption of Gates and rejection of Aguilar-Spinelli. State v. Dibrell, 2018 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 224 (Mar. 26, 2018). There … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on TN: Uncorroborated anonymous tip insufficient

W.D.Va.: Prisoner suit for recording attorney-client meetings survives 6A claim but 4A denied on QI

Plaintiff, a prison inmate, had his conversations with his lawyer in trial preparation recorded by prison officials. He sued for interference with his right to counsel and for a Fourth Amendment violation. Defendant’s summary judgment motion is denied on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Prisoner suit for recording attorney-client meetings survives 6A claim but 4A denied on QI

CA6: 4A doesn’t apply to removal of stuff from an inmate’s cell after a shakedown search

“Cody failed to state a Fourth Amendment claim for relief. He claimed that the defendants violated his Fourth Amendment rights by removing property from his cell during routine searches. But Cody was in prison, and ‘the Fourth Amendment proscription against … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA6: 4A doesn’t apply to removal of stuff from an inmate’s cell after a shakedown search

CA6: Ptf inmate’s bodily privacy not unreasonably violated because female guard saw him in shower

Summary judgment was properly granted against plaintiff’s prison Fourth Amendment claim that his privacy rights were violated because a female guard happened to see him in the shower. He has a limited reasonable expectation of privacy in his bodily privacy … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA6: Ptf inmate’s bodily privacy not unreasonably violated because female guard saw him in shower

LA1: Look in mailbox to confirm def’s address was after they’d confirmed his apartment; not unreasonable

In the course of a homicide investigation, the victim was shown to have last talked to defendant on his cell phone just before his murder. That led to getting his picture to show to a witness who ID’d him as … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on LA1: Look in mailbox to confirm def’s address was after they’d confirmed his apartment; not unreasonable

GA: Nexus shown where def left house and drove directly to controlled buy

Deleting the detective’s false statement from the affidavit that he had seen a black male with short dreadlocks in an SUV, the affidavit nonetheless provided probable cause to issue the warrant based on a controlled buy from defendant. The remainder … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on GA: Nexus shown where def left house and drove directly to controlled buy

GA: No IAC for not challenging nonprejudicial typo in the SW affidavit

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress the search warrant for defendant’s cell phones for a typographical error on the date of the alleged offense in the application for the warrant. The affidavit was clear what … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on GA: No IAC for not challenging nonprejudicial typo in the SW affidavit

E.D.Cal.: A civil detainee has no REP in his cell, despite not being a convict

A civil commitment detainee has more rights than a convict in a jail, but still practically none in his living area from a search for alleged contraband. Warrior v. Santiago, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22742 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2018). … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: A civil detainee has no REP in his cell, despite not being a convict

Cal.5th: SVP’s dorm is virtually like a prison cell subject to random warrantless searches

Defendant is a sexually violent predator (SVP), and he’s institutionalized. His custodial status shares all the attributes of being in prison, including institutional security. The only place an SVP could hide child pornography is in his dormitory room. His room … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on Cal.5th: SVP’s dorm is virtually like a prison cell subject to random warrantless searches