S.D.N.Y.: Abandoning three large dogs to flee is more than just “mere refusal to cooperate”

“At the very least, leaving three large dogs effectively unrestrained in a public place to flee from law enforcement certainly amounts to more than the ‘mere refusal to cooperate’ that is protected by the Fourth Amendment. Cf. [Wardlow, 528 U.S. at 125].” United States v. Boone, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133655 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2025).

The affidavit for warrant was not so lacking in its showing of probable cause that the good faith exception would not apply. United States v. Melvin, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17290 (3d Cir. July 14, 2025).*

“The caselaw makes clear that weaving within a lane of traffic, by itself, may provide the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify a traffic stop.” There was cause for this stop. State v. Mangen, 2025 Minn. App. LEXIS 227 (Ct. App. July 14, 2025).*

“The warrant’s authorization to review all contents of the phone ‘in order to locate evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of the Subject Crimes’ was not overbroad or insufficiently particular where the warrant included a detailed and particularized list of the information to be seized.” People v. Morris, 2025 NY Slip Op 03261, 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4201 (1st Dept. July 14, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.