KS: There’s a statutory right of def to SW affidavits

A person accused has a statutory right of access to search warrant affidavits in his own case. “The applicable provisions state only that the documents ‘shall be made available’ to defendants ‘when requested,’ without specifying to whom the request should be directed.” State v. Haynes, 2025 Kan. LEXIS 157 (July 3, 2025).

“A police officer armed with probable cause to believe a home contains evidence of a serious crime that might otherwise be destroyed may lawfully secure the home and restrict entry while waiting for an assisting officer to diligently procure a search warrant.” There was exigency and defendant also consented to it all. State v. Arredondo, 2025 Kan. LEXIS 158 (July 3, 2025).*

Disagreeing with a state visibility of the license plate number in federal cases, the state court clarifies that the totality of circumstances applies to the visibility requirement which can be different things at different times and conditions. Whether the state name is clearly visible isn’t a statutory requirement. Denial of motion to suppress reversed, and the case is remanded. State v. Beck, 2025 Kan. LEXIS 155 (July 3, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.