Reason: Man Accused of Soliciting Teen Girl Walks Because of Federal Overreach

Not a 4A case, but one of mine:

Reason: Man Accused of Soliciting Teen Girl Walks Because of Federal Overreach by Elizabeth Nolan Brown (“In its zeal to ratchet up more sex trafficking prosecutions, the Department of Justice (DOJ) overreached—and it backfired. Now, a seeming sexual predator may escape conviction because the feds couldn’t just leave local crime to local authorities. The DOJ tried to invoke jurisdiction because the potential predator—an adult man who tried to pay his friend’s teen daughter for sex on multiple occasions—used money, used a car that was made out of state, and drove on a road. No dice, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit said in an October 2 decision. Allowing this would put us on the path to letting Congress usurp police power retained by the states and federalize virtually any crime.”)

The client was detained on conviction, and the client fired me for being ineffective. But the trial judge set aside the verdict after about a month based on my motion for judgment of acquittal and released the client. United States v. Arif, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93295 (E.D. Ark. May 24, 2024), aff’d 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 25582 (8th Cir. Oct. 2, 2025). Another lawyer handled the appeal.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.