W.D.Pa.: Someone actually succeeds in a Franks challenge

Defendant succeeds in a Franks challenge: Defendant’s case arose because the officer swore that defendant matched a surveillance video of a robbery. He really believed it, but he was wrong because there were obvious reasons to discount his belief. The court finds that defendant prevailed in his Franks burden of showing recklessness and that it was all material to the probable cause finding. The search of his house is suppressed. United States v. Broadus, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122021 (W.D. Pa. May 27, 2025).

The fact the RI license plate was registered to a different vehicle was justification for this stop in Idaho. State v. Sherwood, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 71 (June 30, 2025).*

A 19 year old was having sex with a 16 year old and recorded it. He threatened to “post your shit to Facebook.” A search warrant for the phone produced the images, and he was convicted of child pornography. United States v. Lee, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16022 (10th Cir. June 30, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.