N.D.Fla.: Rehearing denied; interruptions of counsel during suppression hearing were because counsel was wasting time asking repetitive questions; she lost on merits, not because of interruptions

Defendant’s motion for rehearing of the motion to suppress is denied. Defense counsel was interrupted during the witness examination, but it was because the questioning was repetitive and beating a dead horse. She lost on the merits and lack of facts on her side, and not because counsel was interrupted wasting time. United States v. Hill, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198344 (N.D. Fla. Nov. 21, 2018).

Defendant’s arrest for threatening telephone calls was justified by the facts, and that included his own corroboration for being abusive to the officer on the telephone. The good faith exception doesn’t need to be considered; but it is, and there is. United States v. Anaya, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197711 (D. N.M. Nov. 20, 2018).*