KS: Exigency permitted officers to enter home when DUI suspect needed to go inside

Defendant was detained in his driveway for DUI and potential violation of an order of protection, which were both jailable offenses. He wanted to go inside to put his kids to bed, and it was not unreasonable for officers to go with him because he could lock himself in the house or consume more alcohol [not to mention resist arrest]. Therefore, there was exigency. State v. Keenan, 2014 Kan. App. LEXIS 36 (May 30, 2014).*

Defendant was not seized merely by asking for his ID to run a warrant check. He was disheveled sitting on a park bench, and a syringe cap was on the bench. State v. Campbell, 263 Or. App. __, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 721 (May 29, 2014).*

The information in the affidavit for search warrant, taken as a whole, shows probable cause. United States v. Prince, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73756 (W.D. Okla. May 30, 2014).*

A U.S. Park Ranger had cause to stop defendant for having an open container in his vehicle. The ranger was dealing with a bear; defendant stopped right next to him, and it was obvious. United States v. Saidmasgati, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73951 (E.D. Cal. May 29, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.