Daily Archives: December 28, 2023

LA5: Omission wasn’t material for Franks and it was only negligent, if anything

“There is no evidence to demonstrate that any omission of Mr. Daleo’s prior statement in the probable cause affidavits was intentional. Further, we find the applications demonstrate that the attesting officers had reasonable grounds to believe that defendant’s residence and … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on LA5: Omission wasn’t material for Franks and it was only negligent, if anything

OH7: Ohio SW can be for info on California server; SCA contemplates it and CA law says providers must comply with out-of-state process

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging a social media account search warrant issued in Ohio on a California server. The SCA contemplates this, and California law directs computer companies to honor process from other states. Defendant can’t win on … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Social media warrants | Comments Off on OH7: Ohio SW can be for info on California server; SCA contemplates it and CA law says providers must comply with out-of-state process

E.D.Mich.: Typo in affidavit for SW doesn’t support Franks challenge

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails. “At the hearing, Hill presented nothing to establish that this inconsistency was anything other than a negligent typographical error. While he maintained that the affidavits were riddled with falsehoods, he was unable—despite repeated questioning—to pinpoint any … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Typo in affidavit for SW doesn’t support Franks challenge

CA9: Defs had no standing in part of commercial premises searched of business they ran

Standing in commercial property, even run by defendants, is evaluated differently than in residential property, more on a case-by-case basis. Defendants make a Franks challenge to the warrant, but they fail on standing in this commercial space. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on CA9: Defs had no standing in part of commercial premises searched of business they ran