Daily Archives: July 28, 2016

Miami Herald: He was arrested for meth, but the crumbs in his car were Krispy Kreme doughnut glaze

Miami Herald: He was arrested for meth, but the crumbs in his car were Krispy Kreme doughnut glaze by Alex Harris: Daniel Rushing was arrested, charged with possession with a weapon, strip-searched and jailed in December. The 64-year-old Orlando man … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Miami Herald: He was arrested for meth, but the crumbs in his car were Krispy Kreme doughnut glaze

New Law Review Article: Protecting the Fourth Amendment in the Information Age: A Response to Robert Litt

New Law Review Article: Protecting the Fourth Amendment in the Information Age: A Response to Robert Litt by Cindy Cohn (short form here without footnotes)

Posted in National security, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: Protecting the Fourth Amendment in the Information Age: A Response to Robert Litt

C.D.Cal.: Purging an invalid consent search from the affidavit for SW, the remainder shows no PC, so search suppressed

The testimony of the defendants on consent was consistent, detailed, and credible, but the testimony of the officers was vague. Thus, the consent is found invalid. Since the consent search made it into the affidavit for the search warrant, it … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Purging an invalid consent search from the affidavit for SW, the remainder shows no PC, so search suppressed

M.D.Ala.: Def didn’t show standing but gov’t didn’t raise it, so it’s waived

The court finds on the face of the pleadings that one defendant had no standing to contest the search but goes to the merits because the government failed to assert standing. United States v. Pierce, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93614 … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Def didn’t show standing but gov’t didn’t raise it, so it’s waived

CA8: Car in abandoned car wash bay in high crime area in middle of night occupied by a known criminal was RS

The officer here came upon a car parked in an empty car wash bay in the middle of the night in a high crime area. When he saw and recognized defendant, to him a known criminal, he had reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Car in abandoned car wash bay in high crime area in middle of night occupied by a known criminal was RS

CA8: Record supports consent because that’s all district court had

Defendant put a backpack in the shed of Allen, and Allen told the police he didn’t put a lock on the shed and consented to cutting it off and the entry. An officer testified that defendant consented too, and defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on CA8: Record supports consent because that’s all district court had

E.D.Wis.: CI’s only nonpublic fact wasn’t corroborated, so no RS

The tipster provided only easily known public information, but for the fact defendant sat in his car and smoked marijuana during his lunch breaks. Police watched him and he didn’t do that. Because the police never corroborated the one observable … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: CI’s only nonpublic fact wasn’t corroborated, so no RS

TN: CI’s tale def was coming to apartment complex to do a drug deal was corroborated by him showing up and apparently doing a drug deal

The CI’s information defendant would be delivering crack cocaine to a specific apartment complex and an officer’s personal observations of defendant arriving there and engaging in what appeared to be a drug deal were sufficient to create reasonable suspicion to … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on TN: CI’s tale def was coming to apartment complex to do a drug deal was corroborated by him showing up and apparently doing a drug deal

OH5: Where motion to suppress was actually pursued as a motion in limine, appeal after conditional plea fails

Defendant’s motion to suppress was cast as a motion in limine that the police officers should be barred from testifying because their police car wasn’t properly marked. The trial court denied the motion and defendant conditionally pled. He can’t appeal … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on OH5: Where motion to suppress was actually pursued as a motion in limine, appeal after conditional plea fails