Daily Archives: February 19, 2015

Slate: Google Says Proposed DoJ Warrant Tweaks Are “Monumental” Fourth Amendment Violation

Slate: Google Says Proposed DoJ Warrant Tweaks Are “Monumental” Fourth Amendment Violation by Lily Hay Newman: The Department of Justice has been working to revise a federal criminal procedure rule to make it easier for judges to issue search warrants … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Slate: Google Says Proposed DoJ Warrant Tweaks Are “Monumental” Fourth Amendment Violation

The Intercept: FBI Flouts Obama Directive to Limit Gag Orders on National Security Letters

The Intercept: FBI Flouts Obama Directive to Limit Gag Orders on National Security Letters by Dan Froomkin: Despite the post-Snowden spotlight on mass surveillance, the intelligence community’s easiest end-run around the Fourth Amendment since 2001 has been something called a … Continue reading

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on The Intercept: FBI Flouts Obama Directive to Limit Gag Orders on National Security Letters

AR: Anonymous tip def was in a hotel room was insufficient under Payton for entry on arrest warrant

Defendant was wanted for bank robbery, and the police had an arrest warrant. In a case of first impression, an anonymous tip that defendant was in a hotel room was not enough to base an entry on the arrest warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on AR: Anonymous tip def was in a hotel room was insufficient under Payton for entry on arrest warrant

CT: Refusal to cooperate with SW for DNA swab admissible to show consciousness of guilt

While one can refuse a consent search, refusal to cooperate with a search warrant can be used as evidence of guilt; here an attempt to take DNA by search warrant, all captured on video. It was relevant as showing defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on CT: Refusal to cooperate with SW for DNA swab admissible to show consciousness of guilt

D.Mass.: Frisk justified of a known gang member in a high crime area getting out of car with his hand in his pocket

Defendant was in a high crime area and known to be a member of a violent street gang. When he got out of a vehicle with a hand in his coat pocket, a frisk was justified. United States v. Vargas, … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Frisk justified of a known gang member in a high crime area getting out of car with his hand in his pocket

The Register (UK): Google strongly opposes plans to let ANY US COURT authorise digi-snoops

The Register (UK): Google strongly opposes plans to let ANY US COURT authorise digi-snoops: Google has strongly opposed US government plans to expand federal powers to authorise remote searches of digital data – claiming in a letter the powers will … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on The Register (UK): Google strongly opposes plans to let ANY US COURT authorise digi-snoops

EFF to Supreme Court: The Fourth Amendment Covers DNA Collection

EFF to Supreme Court: The Fourth Amendment Covers DNA Collection: San Francisco – People have a Fourth Amendment right to privacy when it comes to their genetic material, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) argues in an amicus brief filed this … Continue reading

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on EFF to Supreme Court: The Fourth Amendment Covers DNA Collection

OH3: “[Y]ou’re gonna do what you’re gonna do. Do what you gotta do” was consent to a blood draw

Defendant finally said in apparent exasperation about a blood test: “you’re gonna do what you’re gonna do. Do what you gotta do.” This was a valid consent on the totality. State v. Hosko, 2015-Ohio-570, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 530 (3d … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on OH3: “[Y]ou’re gonna do what you’re gonna do. Do what you gotta do” was consent to a blood draw

W.D.Wis.: A wired CI can video a statement of the defendant in his house

Defendant invited a wired CI into his place who video recorded only his conversations with him. This doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment, citing the “false friend” cases. United States v. Thompson, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18600 (W.D. Wis. February 17, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: A wired CI can video a statement of the defendant in his house