Daily Archives: October 8, 2014

Courthouse News Service: U.S. Must Reveal Some Tracking Technology

Courthouse News Service: U.S. Must Reveal Some Tracking Technology by Elizabeth Warmerdam: The Department of Justice must release documents on government policies and procedures for use of location-tracking technology in Northern California, a federal judge ruled.

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on Courthouse News Service: U.S. Must Reveal Some Tracking Technology

N.D.Iowa: Following defendant into his driveway did not violate curtilage

Following defendant into his driveway did not violate curtilage. The officer walked around the truck to see if it matched one in a store surveillance video. United States v. Rojas, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140708 (N.D. Iowa October 3, 2014), … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Following defendant into his driveway did not violate curtilage

GA: Lost original affidavit for SW may be proved by testimony

A lost original affidavit for a search warrant can still be proved by testimony that the warrant was otherwise validly issued. Thus, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging it on appeal where the record was made on the lost … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Probation / Parole search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on GA: Lost original affidavit for SW may be proved by testimony

NY4: “[T]he police may not ask an occupant of a lawfully stopped vehicle if he or she has any weapons unless they have a founded suspicion”

“[T]he police may not ask an occupant of a lawfully stopped vehicle if he or she has any weapons unless they have a founded suspicion that criminality is afoot.” The search here was invalid. People v. Wideman, 2014 NY Slip … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: “[T]he police may not ask an occupant of a lawfully stopped vehicle if he or she has any weapons unless they have a founded suspicion”

CT: Was SI of closet near def handcuffed face down within his reach? Close question, so harmless error applied

Was a defendant handcuffed face down potentially still enough of a risk of danger that a search incident of a closet four feet from him might have been reasonable? Pills were found instead of a weapon. This is a close … Continue reading

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on CT: Was SI of closet near def handcuffed face down within his reach? Close question, so harmless error applied

Inquistor: ‘Do You Accept Jesus Christ?’ Cop Asks Woman During Traffic Stop, Now She’s Suing Him

Inquistor: ‘Do You Accept Jesus Christ?’ Cop Asks Woman During Traffic Stop, Now She’s Suing Him When Indiana State Trooper Brian Hamilton pulled over 60-year-old Ellen Bogan for some sort of supposed traffic violation in August, he asked for her … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Inquistor: ‘Do You Accept Jesus Christ?’ Cop Asks Woman During Traffic Stop, Now She’s Suing Him

OR: Impoundment of defendant’s car in his own driveway was unreasonable

In an almost identical case, the Ninth Circuit previously held that impoundment of defendant’s car parked in his own driveway was unconstitutional. Using the community caretaking to seize defendant’s car from his driveway for safekeeping was unreasonable. State v. Gonzales, … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Inventory, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OR: Impoundment of defendant’s car in his own driveway was unreasonable

S.D.Ala.: SW for drugs doesn’t need to mention firearms to seize them when found

A search warrant for drugs doesn’t have to mention firearms to seize them. Firearms and drugs are usually linked, and there is a reasonable inference that the presence of firearms around drugs means they are related to each other. United … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: SW for drugs doesn’t need to mention firearms to seize them when found