Daily Archives: July 23, 2014

NYT: Prosecutors Are Reading Emails From Inmates to Lawyers

NYT: Prosecutors Are Reading Emails From Inmates to Lawyers by Stephanie Clifford: The extortion case against Thomas DiFiore, a reputed boss in the Bonanno crime family, encompassed thousands of pages of evidence, including surveillance photographs, cellphone and property records, and … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NYT: Prosecutors Are Reading Emails From Inmates to Lawyers

W.D.Pa.: No standing in CSLI of somebody else’s cell phone

A cell phone user has no reasonable expectation of privacy in cell site location data records kept by the telephone company of a telephone that he was using that he was not the subscriber to. United States v. Woodley, 2014 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: No standing in CSLI of somebody else’s cell phone

D.S.D.: Danger not defused, so officer could conduct frisk; it’s “akin to the doctrine of a ‘protective sweep'”

I’ve analogized a frisk of a car authorized under Long as a ‘protective sweep,’ which is usually of a dwelling. Here, a court does too: Officers responded to a use of force report that had been not completely defused. When … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Danger not defused, so officer could conduct frisk; it’s “akin to the doctrine of a ‘protective sweep'”

D.Nev.: Jones GPS ruling is not retroactive on collateral review

United States v. Jones GPS ruling is not retroactive on collateral review. United States v. Wineman, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98665 (D. Nev. February 27, 2014). Defendant’s stop was based on an unsubstantiated CI and there was no traffic offense. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Jones GPS ruling is not retroactive on collateral review

PA: Request for ID of two men sitting at a vacant building didn’t rise to a detention

Two men sitting at a vacant building in the daytime, but in an area known for burglaries, could be asked for identification and it written down. It was a mere encounter and not a detention. One defendant’s continued furtive conduct … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Request for ID of two men sitting at a vacant building didn’t rise to a detention

CA6: Heck bar doesn’t apply to third parties not in prior criminal case

One plaintiff’s complaint over his arrest was Heck barred, but third party Fourth Amendment claims were not. [This came up through a complex procedural issue.] Hayward v. Cleveland Clinic Found., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13802, 2014 FED App. 0157P (6th … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Inventory | Comments Off on CA6: Heck bar doesn’t apply to third parties not in prior criminal case