CA8: Crowd dispersal was not a seizure

Police actions in dispersing a crowd were not a seizure, even using less than lethal force. Perkins v. City of Des Moines, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6528 (8th Cir. Mar. 5, 2026).*

CBP officer’s conviction for excessive force on a detainee is affirmed. United States v. Delgado, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6254 (5th Cir. Mar. 3, 2026).*

“In fact, in making this decision, the question is not whether Brown actually had probable cause, but only whether he arguably had probable cause. Galanakis v. City of Newton, Iowa, 134 F.4th 998, 1003 (8th Cir. 2025); Joseph v. Allen, 712 F.3d 1222, 1226 (8th Cir. 2013) (arguable probable cause exists even if officer mistakenly arrests a suspect, so long as the mistake is objectively reasonable). … It was objectively reasonable for Brown to believe that Nelson was the suspect driving away from the fight. Although unpleasant for Nelson, objectively reasonable mistakes of fact do not violate the Fourth Amendment. Heien v. North Carolina, 574 U.S. 54, 60 (2014).” Nelson v. Brown, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44284 (E.D. Ark. Mar. 2, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.