D.Minn.: Def arrested away from his motorcycle couldn’t have his attached backpack inventoried

Defendant was on the patio of a bar drinking a beer, and his motorcycle was 50-100′ away with his backpack on it. He was arrested, and he’d arranged for others to take his motorcycle. The backpack was seized and searched. It was not abandoned, and it was not a proper inventory. United States v. White, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44504 (D. Minn. Jan. 14, 2026).

Defendant’s stop revealed marijuana in plain view, and that was reasonable suspicion for a probation search, too. United States v. Ellison, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44441 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 20, 2026).*

Defendant was stopped because his LPN didn’t match his truck, and reasonable suspicion quickly developed allowing for a dog sniff. The dog alerted, so the automobile exception applies. Fort Peck Tribes v. Grandchamp, 2026 Mont. Fort Peck Tribe LEXIS 3 (Mar. 3, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Inventory, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.