D.P.R.: Officer’s construction of traffic law was “ardous” and unreasonable under Heien

The officer’s conclusion defendant violated a U-turn statute was unreasonable, and the motion to suppress is granted. “While mistakes of law based on arduous questions of statutory interpretation may justify an officer’s judgment, a poor study of the law cannot constitute a reasonable mistake. [Heien] at 55. ‘Thus, an officer can gain no Fourth Amendment advantage through a sloppy study of the law he is duty-bound to enforce.’ Id. at 67.” United States v. Pizarro-Quiñones, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184047 (D.P.R. Oct. 7, 2024).

2254 petitioner doesn’t show that he didn’t get a full and fair opportunity to litigate his search issue in state court. Shaw v. Buesgen, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183157 (W.D. Wis. Oct. 7, 2024).*

Facebook on its own perused user accounts for child pornography, finding some attributable to defendant. The fact Facebook had a dual motive of protecting its business interests and then turning over what it finds to NCMEC and thus to the government still made it not a private search. United States v. Azucenas, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 25489 (9th Cir. Oct. 8, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Issue preclusion, Private search, Reasonableness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.