UT: NCMEC didn’t look at the CP this time, but it had this case, and that’s enough

The fact the hash value of defendant’s material was known to be child pornography, it didn’t matter that NCMEC didn’t view the material before passing it on to the police who did. There was a prior private search. State v. Williamson, 2024 UT App 141, 2024 Utah App. LEXIS 142 (Oct. 3, 2024).

The officers collectively had reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop, and the facts communicated to his PO was enough for a search. United States v. Madarassy, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181223 (D. Mont. Oct. 3, 2024).*

There was probable cause for defendant’s search warrant so defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging it. United States v. Allen, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181466 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 4, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Private search, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.