E.D.La.: SW for def’s surveillance video had no PC for weapons search; suppressed

Police got a search warrant for the DVR and storage for defendant’s surveillance camera that likely could have caught a homicide across the street. The warrant included weapons and ammunition when there was no justification for it. The warrant lacked all probable cause. The plain view doctrine is relied on by the government, too, but that involved a search of defendant’s bedroom where the DVR wasn’t. The gun was on the nightstand. Gun suppressed; cell phone not. United States v. Riley, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115241 (E.D. La. July 1, 2024).

Pro se defendant waived his Fourth Amendment claim by not presenting it to the trial court. Keller v. State, 2024 WY 72 (July 1, 2024).*

“Although VanBuren searched Frampton before searching the vehicle, the officers had probable cause to search the vehicle regardless of the evidence found on Frampton. Both officers testified that they planned to search the vehicle once they smelled marijuana. And that smell, along with the marijuana grinder on the center console and Burt’s admission to smoking marijuana two hours earlier, was sufficient to establish probable cause.” United States v. Burt, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 15973 (2d Cir. July 1, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Video surveillance, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.