PA: PO could send parolee’s GPS tracking to CID

Defendant was on parole for armed robbery, wearing a GPS tracker. It was reasonable for parole to send his tracking information to a detective investigating him for another robbery. Commonwealth v. Rosendary, 2024 PA Super 51, 2024 Pa. Super. LEXIS 95 (Mar. 19, 2024).

No suppression hearing required when the facts alleged in the motion to suppress don’t show a fact dispute. United States v. Torres, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 6475 (11th Cir. Mar. 19, 2024).

The use of deadly force against plaintiff was reasonable in the videos of the occurrence. Howard v. DeKalb Cty., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 6476 (11th Cir. Mar. 19, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.