WA: Parole search of cell phone was reasonable

Defendant was on supervision for a sex offense. He was required to disclose all his dating relationships. A parole search of his cell phone was reasonable, and it revealed other violations. In re Pers. Restraint of Allgoewer, 2024 Wash. App. LEXIS 511 (Mar. 19, 2024).

2254 petitioner had his full and fair opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claim and did. Hrytsyak v. Ohio, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48010 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 7, 2024).*

The district court did not adequately explain the search condition on supervised release. Vacated. United States v. Jackson, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 6398 (4th Cir. Mar. 18, 2024).

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.