OH1: Trial court erred in not suppressing when officer couldn’t remember the basis of stop

Defendant satisfied his burden of pleading by stating the stop was without justification. At the hearing on the motion to suppress this OVI case, the officer couldn’t remember why defendant was stopped. The trial court erred in not suppressing. State v. Watts, 2024-Ohio-635, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 609 (1st Dist. Feb. 21 2024).

Officers responding to a 911 call about threats had probable cause to search defendant’s car when they looked in the window and saw a possible weapon. United States v. Crawford, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 3657 (8th Cir. Feb. 16, 2024).*

Plaintiff’s IFP complaint against police officers for stopping him with expired tags doesn’t state a claim. fn.6: “Should Serrano-Bey choose to file an amended complaint, he is encouraged to avoid couching his claims in Moorish sovereign citizen verbiage and to avoid the use of legalisms.” Serrano-Bey v. Muvha, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27115 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 16, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Burden of proof, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.