CA9: Stepping back and allowing officers to enter is consent to enter

“Given Lege’s affirmative consent and the fact that he stepped back and appeared to welcome Oster into his apartment, a reasonable officer would have concluded that he had consent to enter the apartment, …, and the district court properly concluded that no reasonable juror would find to the contrary.” Lege v. City of Ketchikan, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 23078 (9th Cir. Aug. 18, 2022).

The GPS tracking warrant was supported by probable cause, and the Franks challenge failed. United States v. Edwards, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148181 (D. Minn. June 21, 2022).*

Defendant was reasonably subjected to an investigative detention, not a felony stop with weapons drawn. United States v. Curiel-Rodriguez, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148272 (D. Colo. Aug. 18, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Consent, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.