S.D.Cal. gives helpful explanation of application of Heck bar

A helpful explanation of the Heck bar to Fourth Amendment claims is Cordova v. Imperial Cnty. Narcotics Task Force, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3993 (S.D.Cal. Jan. 7, 2022).*

Plaintiff lost her excessive force claim, and the defendants sought attorneys fees from her. Denied: It was not frivolous even though she lost. Dorsey v. City of Lafayette, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4008 (W.D.La. Jan. 7, 2022).*

Plaintiff sued his state probation officer for drug tests and a home search clearly based on reasonable suspicion. [And that’s not even required under Arkansas law.] He fails to state a claim. Muniz v. Ervin, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4461 (W.D.Ark. Jan. 10, 2022).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.