E.D.Pa.: Multitude of facts supports nexus of evidence of robbery to def’s home

“Based upon the magnitude of the facts described in the search warrant affidavit, the issuing judge was justified in drawing a reasonable inference that physical evidence of Defendant’s alleged robberies would be found at his home. Defendant’s charged crimes, two counts of robbery and two counts of using a firearm in connection with a crime of violence, involve physical evidence that was expected to be found in the perpetrator’s home, such as cash, a gun, and clothing.” United States v. Wright, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191663 (E.D.Pa. Oct. 4, 2021).

A monitored call between a CI and defendant was probable cause for a search. United States v. Badley, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191482 (N.D.Ohio Oct. 5, 2021).*

There was probable cause for the search warrant for defendant’s place, and his Franks challenge fails for a conclusory offer of proof. Collier v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191527 (D.N.D. Oct. 5, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.