TX13: Truck mechanic conducted private search of flash drive found in door

Defendant took his pickup truck in for service at the local Ford dealer. While working on the truck, the mechanic found a flash drive in the door pocket and plugged it into the diagnostic laptop plugged into defendant’s truck. Instead of finding music, which they expected, they found child pornography. Defendant had both a subjective and objective reasonable expectation of privacy in the thumb drive. This was, however, a private search not in violation of the Fourth Amendment or Texas Constitution or the Texas exclusionary rule. Salinas v. State, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 3734 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi – Edinburg May 13, 2021).

“Considering that knowledge of the ability to refuse consent is not a determinative factor, in conjunction with the fact that the remainder of the factors weigh in favor of voluntary consent, indicates to the Court that Defendant’s consent was voluntarily given.” United States v. Taylor, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90604 (D. Nev. May 12, 2021).*

A significant amount of cash in defendant’s car coupled with his drug history help provide nexus to search his house for drugs. United States v. Lawson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90629 (E.D. Ky. May 12, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Nexus, Private search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.