CA8: If officers “lingered” during protective sweep, nothing else was found as a result

Defendant complained that the officers “lingered” during the protective sweep. Even if they did, nothing else was found as a result. United States v. Crutchfield, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 34446 (8th Cir. Nov. 2, 2020).

The driver of the car defendant was a passenger in consented to a search. The passenger’s purse was reasonably believed to be hers. When it was opened and her ID was found, the drugs inside were in plain view. State v. Andera, 307 Neb. 686 (Oct. 30, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Protective sweep, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.