ID: Defendant’s consent to enter to look for wanted felon cured alleged curtilage violation

Police came to defendant’s trailer on rural property looking for a wanted felon. He consented to an entry to look for the guy, and inside the officers smelled then saw raw marijuana and paraphernalia. Even if the entry onto the curtilage was unreasonable, defendant didn’t show that it was exploited by the police because of his consent [essentially] curing that issue. State v. Kapelle, 2014 Ida. App. LEXIS 49 (May 7, 2014), substitute opinion State v. Kapelle, 2014 Ida. App. LEXIS 72 (July 24, 2014). [The property was not completely rural because defendant was in an Internet chat room with his computer’s camera when the police knocked.]

A child pornography defendant who used LimeWire has no reasonable expectation of privacy in his computer files accessible from outside his home. United States v. Hill, 750 F.3d 982 (8th Cir. 2014).*

The officer had reasonable suspicion to extend the stop from furtive movements, excessive nervousness, and admission of drug use. Baker v. State, 2014 Ga. App. LEXIS 317 (May 6, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.