Daily Archives: August 21, 2025

CA8: A summons to come to court is not a 4A seizure

A summons to come to court is not a Fourth Amendment seizure. Brown v. City of Dermott, Arkansas, 23-3073 (8th Cir. Aug. 19, 2025). The search of defendant’s vehicle was valid both under the automobile exception and inventory. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Knock and talk, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: A summons to come to court is not a 4A seizure

S.D.N.Y.: Failure to plead how 4A was violated denies return of laptop

The motion for return of the target’s laptop for violating the Fourth Amendment is denied because he doesn’t plead how the Fourth Amendment was violated. Commodities Future Trading Commission v. Alexandre, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160456 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Failure to plead how 4A was violated denies return of laptop

Guam case shows: Don’t cross examine about the CI without a clear goal in mind

This started with a CI for a search warrant, but the hearing on the motion to suppress revealed there were actually three others. That information was outside the “four corners” but it cemented the probable cause. Guam v. Guerrero, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Guam case shows: Don’t cross examine about the CI without a clear goal in mind