Daily Archives: April 1, 2020

E.D.Mich.: Preliminary injunction denied against compulsory blood testing of newborns

Michigan blood tests newborns for certain diseases. Based on Kanuszewski v. Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, 333 F. Supp. 3d 716 (E.D. Mich. 2018), the court finds that the parents are unlikely to succeed on a preliminary injunction. … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Preliminary injunction denied against compulsory blood testing of newborns

CADC: AE applied to boxes police reasonably believed contained evidence that was being removed from the premises

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to suppress the seizure of boxes of evidence from defendant’s car. It was reasonable for the officers to believe defendant was loading the car to move evidence to hide it when the police … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Automobile exception | Comments Off on CADC: AE applied to boxes police reasonably believed contained evidence that was being removed from the premises

Courthouse News: San Francisco OKs $369,000 Settlement for Journalist Targeted by Police

Courthouse News: San Francisco OKs $369,000 Settlement for Journalist Targeted by Police by Nicholas Iovino (“A journalist whose home was raided by police will get $369,000 from San Francisco taxpayers under the terms of a settlement approved by the city’s … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Courthouse News: San Francisco OKs $369,000 Settlement for Journalist Targeted by Police

CA4: Ptf’s 4A claim cell site simulator used on him remanded to District Court for more factfinding

Plaintiff sued because the Baltimore Police Department used a cell site simulator to locate him, and that violated the Fourth Amendment. The district court’s findings are based on an inadequate record and the case is remanded for more factfinding. Andrews … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on CA4: Ptf’s 4A claim cell site simulator used on him remanded to District Court for more factfinding

CA8 dissent from rehearing en banc: Panel misapplied qualified immunity on use of Taser

Two judges of the Eighth Circuit dissented from denial of rehearing en banc of 944 F.3d 704 (8th Cir. Ark. Dec. 3, 2019) that the panel misapplied qualified immunity. Jackson v. Stair, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 9540 (8th Cir. Mar. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8 dissent from rehearing en banc: Panel misapplied qualified immunity on use of Taser