Daily Archives: April 4, 2020

Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: Restrictions on Interstate (and Intrastate) Travel in an Epidemic

Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: Restrictions on Interstate (and Intrastate) Travel in an Epidemic (are generally constitutional (whether they forbid travel to a particular place, or require travelers to be temporarily quarantined)) by Eugene Volokh

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: Restrictions on Interstate (and Intrastate) Travel in an Epidemic

CA6: Trash pulls not unreasonable despite local ordinance that only trash collectors permitted in trash

Trash pulls by police are not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, notwithstanding a local ordinance that limits trash collectors to rummaging in trash. United States v. Mathis, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 10275 (6th Cir. Mar. 30, 2020). Defendant’s probation search … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: Trash pulls not unreasonable despite local ordinance that only trash collectors permitted in trash

CA5: 10 am knock-and-talk didn’t violate Jardines

Officers who came to defendant’s door at 10 am and asked for permission to use a dog to sniff his yard didn’t violate Jardines. United States v. Flores, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 10235 (5th Cir. Apr. 1, 2020). “The present … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and talk, Nexus, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: 10 am knock-and-talk didn’t violate Jardines

CA6: Asking about drugs in car during normal incidents of stop not unreasonable under Rodriguez

Defendant’s admission he possessed marijuana in his car was within the normal incidents of the traffic stop, Therefore, the officer could extend the stop under Rodriguez. United States v. Lott, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 10237 (6th Cir. Apr. 1, 2020). … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Asking about drugs in car during normal incidents of stop not unreasonable under Rodriguez

OR: Asking about drugs in car during an “unavoidable lull” in traffic stop was unreasonable under state constitution

Asking about drugs in the car during an “unavoidable lull” in the stop was unreasonable under the state constitution under Arreola-Botello. State v. McBride, 303 Ore. App. 292, 2020 Ore. App. LEXIS 433 (Apr. 1, 2020), on remand from 366 … Continue reading

Posted in State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Asking about drugs in car during an “unavoidable lull” in traffic stop was unreasonable under state constitution

IA: Def’s association with known drug dealers without any nexus to his own house isn’t PC

“Although we decide marginal cases in favor of upholding warrants, we cannot rubber stamp the authorization to search a home unsupported by probable cause. Here, the search warrant application established Higgins’s association with people who used or delivered controlled substances. … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on IA: Def’s association with known drug dealers without any nexus to his own house isn’t PC

CNN: How the cell phones of spring breakers who flouted coronavirus warnings were tracked

CNN: How the cell phones of spring breakers who flouted coronavirus warnings were tracked by Donie O’Sullivan:

Posted in Cell phones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on CNN: How the cell phones of spring breakers who flouted coronavirus warnings were tracked

CA11: Generic state 4A post-conviction petition with no citation of authority waived state claims

A generic state claim for post-conviction relief for ineffective assistance in counsel of a Fourth Amendment claim that cited nothing was no claim at all, and didn’t toll § 2254 limitations. “Dunn’s September 2015 motion merely asserted that her convictions … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA11: Generic state 4A post-conviction petition with no citation of authority waived state claims

D.Haw.: Def failed in her motion to reconsider overseizure by failure to specify exactly what was

Defendant’s motion to suppress was previously denied, but she was allowed to specify what documents were overseized. “[T]he court will consider a motion to suppress specific documents or other evidence based on proof that such items were seized and that … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Overseizure | Comments Off on D.Haw.: Def failed in her motion to reconsider overseizure by failure to specify exactly what was

D.Minn.: “A police officer’s ‘characterization is not enough, standing alone, to implicate Fourth Amendment protections.’” That’s the court’s duty

“A police officer’s ‘characterization is not enough, standing alone, to implicate Fourth Amendment protections.’ Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567, 574, 108 S. Ct. 1975, 100 L. Ed. 2d 565 (1988). The parties’ characterization of the events notwithstanding, the Court … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: “A police officer’s ‘characterization is not enough, standing alone, to implicate Fourth Amendment protections.’” That’s the court’s duty

IL: Pill bottle wasn’t a weapon, and removing it from pocket in a weapons frisk was unreasonable

The officer stopped after he believed defendant shouted an obscenity at him. When the officer looked at defendant, he spit in the officer’s direction. The patdown thereafter was without reasonable suspicion. The removal of a round cylindrical object from his … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Pill bottle wasn’t a weapon, and removing it from pocket in a weapons frisk was unreasonable

S.D.Fla.: SW for apt and seizure of computers and cell phones includes power to search them later

A search warrant to search an apartment and seize computers and cell phones includes the power to search them later. United States v. Quinonez, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55789 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 30, 2020). The officer’s statement that the CI’s … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: SW for apt and seizure of computers and cell phones includes power to search them later