Category Archives: Franks doctrine

E.D.N.C.: If information omitted doesn’t undermine PC, no Franks violation

At worst, the officer’s omission of three things from the affidavit for search warrant was negligent, not reckless, and, even if the material was included, it doesn’t defeat the finding of probable cause. “Thus, because Mr. Simpson has failed to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, E-mail, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: If information omitted doesn’t undermine PC, no Franks violation

SC: Informant not properly supported; showing of PC fails under GFE

The affidavit for the search warrant was false in that it omitted that the informant was really an agent of the police in this endeavor, but it wasn’t material enough for Franks. The crux of the case is that the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on SC: Informant not properly supported; showing of PC fails under GFE

Cal.1: Possession of a felt tip marker not a crime without intent to graffitiize

Possession of a felt tip marker is not per se illegal as possession of graffiti tools. Intent to graffitiize still has to be required. The juvenile’s arrest was without probable cause. In re S.F., 224 Cal. App. 4th 1575 (1st … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.1: Possession of a felt tip marker not a crime without intent to graffitiize

W.D.Mo.: Dog alert on an airplane PC for SW

Defendant was flying a small aircraft, and he diverted from the flight plan. Local police were alerted, and a dog sniff was made of the airplane. The police went to the hotel where defendant was staying to talk to him, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Dog alert on an airplane PC for SW

E.D.Mich.: Just because the facts could be more specific is not a Franks challenge

Just because the facts could be more specific is not a Franks challenge. Here, probable cause was shown. United States v. Adams, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50090 (E.D. Mich. April 11, 2014).* 2255 petitioner’s IAC claim was based in small … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Just because the facts could be more specific is not a Franks challenge