Category Archives: Warrant execution

E.D.Wis.: Armed raid for campaign finance records leads to enjoining investigation for First Amendment violation

Plaintiffs showed enough to enjoin a criminal investigation punctuated by armed raids on plaintiff’s home for campaign finance records for interference with First Amendment political and free speech rights. O’Keefe v. Schlitz, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63066 (E.D. Wis. May … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Armed raid for campaign finance records leads to enjoining investigation for First Amendment violation

WaPo: Just another day in the drug war

WaPo: Just another day in the drug war by Radley Balko Back in 2011, police in Framingham, Massachusetts conducted a drug raid that cost an innocent man his life.

Posted in Uncategorized, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WaPo: Just another day in the drug war

IA: No qualified immunity for overseizure in violation of SW; county attorney’s opinion conferred no additional immunity

The police here were held liable in a § 1983 case in state court for overseizure beyond the scope of the search warrant. They brought along the alleged victim who told them what else to seize and none of it … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Police misconduct, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IA: No qualified immunity for overseizure in violation of SW; county attorney’s opinion conferred no additional immunity

NY3: No-knock and nighttime search warrant to gather DNA from person is excessive and suppressed

No-knock and nighttime search warrant to gather DNA from person is excessive and suppressed as a violation of the Fourth Amendment. It wasn’t going anywhere. A Yankees cap was left at the scene of a robbery and shooting, and the … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Knock and announce, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY3: No-knock and nighttime search warrant to gather DNA from person is excessive and suppressed

Reuters: U.S. judge rules search warrants extend to overseas email accounts — Updated with link

Reuters via CNBC: U.S. judge rules search warrants extend to overseas email accounts by Joseph Ax: NEW YORK, April 25 (Reuters) – Internet service providers must turn over customer emails and other digital content sought by U.S. government search warrants … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Reuters: U.S. judge rules search warrants extend to overseas email accounts — Updated with link

E.D.N.C.: DNA swab a search; taking a second was reasonable here

The taking of DNA by a buccal swab is a search, and here it would be reasonable. While the defendant concedes he was at the scene, he didn’t stipulate the issue away, so the government gets another buccal swab for … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: DNA swab a search; taking a second was reasonable here

D.Vt.: No Fourth Amendment or Rule 41 right to see warrant before execution

Executing officers’ failure to show the search warrant before the search doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. Rule 41 doesn’t even require it before hand. United States v. Wint, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52108 (D. Vt. April 14, 2014):

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Vt.: No Fourth Amendment or Rule 41 right to see warrant before execution

New Law Review Article: Civil discovery as a search? Probable cause required?

New Law Review Article: A Tale of Two Searches: Intrusive Civil Discovery Rules Violate the Fourth Amendment Chad DeVeaux, A Tale of Two Searches: Intrusive Civil Discovery Rules Violate the Fourth Amendment, 46 Conn. L. Rev. 1083 (2014). Abstract:

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant execution | Leave a comment

M.D.Pa.: Failure to show SW not Fourth Amendment violation

Even if defendant was not shown a search warrant during the search (a fact in dispute), that’s not a ground to suppress. It violates Rule 41, but not the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Harley, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49396 … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Warrant execution | Leave a comment