N.D.Cal.: Collateral estoppel bars relitigation in federal court of 4A claim lost in state court

Plaintiff fully litigated his Fourth Amendment claim in state court and lost. Collateral estoppel bars him from pursuing a federal claim for the same thing. Pelton v. Amador, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98995 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2026).

Defendant faults defense counsel for pursuing a meritless motion to suppress he insisted on causing him to forfeit a favorable plea offer. No IAC. State v. Tate, 2026-Ohio-1636 (5th Dist. May 5, 2026).*

That Dropbox reports child porn in its system doesn’t make it a government actor for the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Blocker, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 13026 (7th Cir. May 5, 2026).*

The officer knew defendant from long before, and he has a reasonable belief defendant was driving his car while a probation and parole warrant was out for him. United States v. Rodriguez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99220 (D. Mont. May 5, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.