CA1 declines to get into whether undocumented persons are “people” with 4A rights

The First Circuit declines to get into the issue of whether an undocumented person here are part of the “people” with Fourth Amendment rights, instead deciding he loses on the merits. United States v. Vizcaíno-Peguero, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 13000 (1st Cir. May 5, 2026).

Defendant doesn’t get discovery to help with a Franks challenge; nothing in Franks suggests that. If more develops, he can file a Franks motion. United States v. Bridges, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98583 (D. Me. May 5, 2026).*

A Fourth Amendment violation has nothing to do with removal proceedings. Romero v. Anda-Ybarra, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98642 (W.D. Tex. May 5, 2026).*

The affiant recklessly omitted important information that would have negated probable cause, but it wasn’t material to the ultimate finding of probable cause. United States v. Foster, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98801 (D. Conn. May 5, 2026).* (Helpful case for both sides of the question elsewhere.)

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Immigration arrests, immigration searches, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.