E.D.Pa.: Voluntary statement during search that “everything is mine” was admissible

Voluntary statement from the handcuffed defendant during the search of his house when he saw his handcuffed girlfriend crying that “everything is mine” were admissible. United States v. Espinosa, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160387 (E.D. Pa. July 20, 2026).

Defendant’s Franks motion failed because he didn’t show that the affidavit’s statements about his prior firearm possession were false or misleading in context, failed to demonstrate the affiant acted with intent to mislead, and failed to prove the omission that Lopez never touched firearms when visiting gun stores was material to the probable cause determination for the search warrant. United States v. Lopez, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 21356 (4th Cir. July 20, 2026).*

The court concludes that the bodycam not showing defendant’s gun in the door of his vehicle is not determinative. The bodycam was positioned at least a foot below the officer’s eyes, and the court credits that the officer could see it even if the bodycam didn’t. The seizure of the firearm was reasonable. United States v. Martinez-Rivas, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160367 (N.D. Ala. June 12, 2026),* adopted, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157907 (N.D. Ala. July 15, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Body cameras, Custody, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.