D.Minn.: Gov’t proved exigency for warrantless cell phone ping

Defendant’s cell phone was pinged based on exigency. Defendant claims that it was false. “However, the salient facts on which Sgt. O’Rourke based his request are clearly borne out by the evidence.” United States v. Andrews, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77767 (D. Minn. May 8, 2019).*

eBay is not a government actor, and it provided third-party information. United States v. Schaefer, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77860 (D. Ore. May 8, 2019).*

Plaintiff’s § 1983 case over probable cause and particularity for the search warrant is dismissed on qualified immunity and the merits. Baeza v. Munro, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77854 (D. N.M. May 7, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Cell site location information, Particularity, Third Party Doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.