Daily Archives: December 13, 2025

M.D.Fla.: Suspicious activity reports (SARs) don’t violate the 4A under the third party doctrine

Suspicious activity reports (SARs) don’t violate the Fourth Amendment under the third party doctrine. Fid. Nat’l Fin., Inc. v. Bessent, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 255738 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 9, 2025):

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Suspicious activity reports (SARs) don’t violate the 4A under the third party doctrine

W.D.Ky.: A ruse arrest is legal in CA6

Police using a ruse to arrest defendant is legal in the Sixth Circuit. (Not necessarily in the Ninth, but we’re in the Sixth.) It also doesn’t “shock the conscious [sic, quoting a pleading].” United States v. Carmona, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: A ruse arrest is legal in CA6

TX5: Objection to “call detail records” is not a CSLI objection

A boilerplate motion to suppress cell phone records that wasn’t specific was followed up at trial with an objection to “call detail records” was not an objection to CSLI. Griffin v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 9566 (Tex. App. – … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Standing | Comments Off on TX5: Objection to “call detail records” is not a CSLI objection

D.D.C.: Electronic evidence seized in one investigation of Comey cannot be searched years later for evidence in another; return ordered under Rule 41(g)

When the government retained electronic evidence obtained from a lawyer under a warrant, concluded the investigation, and then, years later, searched the information again in a different investigation, the remedy here was order of immediate return to the lawyer and … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overbreadth, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Electronic evidence seized in one investigation of Comey cannot be searched years later for evidence in another; return ordered under Rule 41(g)