Daily Archives: February 22, 2019

TX13: Unsatisified state requirement issuing magistrate’s name be clearly stated warranted suppression

Texas added a fifth requirement to search warrants that the issuing magistrate’s name be clearly legible. It can be incorporated from the affidavit. Here it wasn’t, and the motion to suppress was properly granted and no good faith exception applies. … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX13: Unsatisified state requirement issuing magistrate’s name be clearly stated warranted suppression

NM: Reserve deputy’s stop of suspected DUI to call for a deputy was a reasonable minor intrusion

A reserve deputy followed defendant who was driving badly and then she ran into a car in her driveway. He stopped behind her and told her to “hang tight,” and he called for a deputy. The stop was reasonable, considering … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NM: Reserve deputy’s stop of suspected DUI to call for a deputy was a reasonable minor intrusion

W.D.Ky.: A customer leaving def’s house with a lot of drugs was nexus to def’s house

“Similarly, in this case, Charles Williams was discovered with a large amount of narcotics immediately after leaving the Target Apartment. … This incident alone is enough to establish a nexus to the Apartment to justify a warrant to search the … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: A customer leaving def’s house with a lot of drugs was nexus to def’s house

NY3: Def counsel was ineffective for not objecting to SW affidavit coming into evidence full of inadmissible informant hearsay

Defendant proved ineffective assistance of counsel from defense counsel’s failure to object to the search warrant application coming into evidence full of informant hearsay that wasn’t admissible in the case in chief. People v. Newman, 2019 NY Slip Op 01263, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NY3: Def counsel was ineffective for not objecting to SW affidavit coming into evidence full of inadmissible informant hearsay

CA4: More than one person can have authority to issue command authorized search under Mil.R.Evid. 315(d)

Defendant was subjected to a command authorized search under Mil.R.Evid. 315(d). He argues that the definition of who is in control to authorize the search isn’t clear. Well, it isn’t, but that doesn’t mean that multiple people might not fit … Continue reading

Posted in Military searches | Comments Off on CA4: More than one person can have authority to issue command authorized search under Mil.R.Evid. 315(d)

D.Me.: Officers’ lack of awareness of def’s mental illness a factor in def’s consent to search

Officers were unaware of defendant’s mental illness when they talked to him and secured his consent. On the totality, it is found voluntary. United States v. Merrill, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25763 (D. Me. Feb. 19, 2019) [it seems to … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on D.Me.: Officers’ lack of awareness of def’s mental illness a factor in def’s consent to search