Daily Archives: September 9, 2016

CT: Two police cars converging on def and telling him to stop was a seizure

Two police cars driving at defendant in a Subway parking lot from different directions and stopping him was a stop. And, he was ordered to stop by an officer. State v. Edmonds, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 251 (Sept. 13, 2015) (concur; … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CT: Two police cars converging on def and telling him to stop was a seizure

E.D.Ky.: “Reasonable cause” for production of taxpayer information from the IRS in a public corruption investigation is less than PC

“Reasonable cause” for production of taxpayer information from the IRS in a public corruption investigation is less than “probable cause.” USMJ denial of order overruled. In re United States for Taxpayer Return Information, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119895 (E.D.Ky. Sept. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: “Reasonable cause” for production of taxpayer information from the IRS in a public corruption investigation is less than PC

MO: Chicken coop inside barbed wire fence tho 100′ from house within curtilage

Defendant’s chicken coop with drugs inside was a fair distance from the house, but it was still within the curtilage. Applying all the Dunn factors, they favor defendant. It was inside a primary barbed wire fence and the contents weren’t … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Open fields | Comments Off on MO: Chicken coop inside barbed wire fence tho 100′ from house within curtilage

NC: Failure to give inventory to target of search doesn’t lead to suppression

The inventory to be given to the person from whom stuff was seized has to be given, but a failure to comply doesn’t warrant suppression. It’s after the search so it doesn’t involve the right to be free from unreasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NC: Failure to give inventory to target of search doesn’t lead to suppression

No cases for two days; initiated act litigation

Initiated act litigation in Arkansas occurs in late August-September every even numbered year. Under Amendment 7 to the Arkansas Constitution, they are original actions in the Arkansas Supreme Court disposed of on super compressed schedules. The first one had the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on No cases for two days; initiated act litigation

ABAJ: Chemerinsky: What will the presidential election mean for SCOTUS? [One of those Duh! articles]

ABAJ: Chemerinsky: What will the presidential election mean for SCOTUS?

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on ABAJ: Chemerinsky: What will the presidential election mean for SCOTUS? [One of those Duh! articles]