NC: Failure to give inventory to target of search doesn’t lead to suppression

The inventory to be given to the person from whom stuff was seized has to be given, but a failure to comply doesn’t warrant suppression. It’s after the search so it doesn’t involve the right to be free from unreasonable search. State v. Downey, 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 916 (Sept. 6, 2016).

There was probable cause for search of defendant’s address for evidence of multiple bank robberies because the car used was tied to that address and defendant gave that as his address. United States v. Moua, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119376 (D.Minn. July 27, 2016),* adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119416 (D.Minn. Sept. 2, 2016).*

There was reasonable suspicion to use a dog on defendant’s car. He was driving at 1:30 am with his headlights off, the windows were overtinted, there was no license plate because he said he did not want to draw attention to himself. State v. Marino, 2016 MT 220, 2016 Mont. LEXIS 794 (Sept. 6, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.