Monthly Archives: June 2015

W.D.N.Y.: A cell phone is an “instrumentality” of a drug crime; turning on a cell phone to see if it answers is not a “search”

Defendant’s 12 cell phones could be seized as instrumentalities of a drug crime under a search warrant. Calling a number the officers obtained during a wiretap to identify a phone was not an illegal search. Turning on the phones just … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Border search, Cell phones, Qualified immunity, Search | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: A cell phone is an “instrumentality” of a drug crime; turning on a cell phone to see if it answers is not a “search”

IL: “Officer safety” here didn’t justify a search because of an alleged “furtive gesture” where defendant was quiet and compliant

Not every movement in a car is a “furtive gesture.” The defendant was quiet and compliant before the officer decided to search the back seat area for “officer safety” solely because defendant reached that way. No other reason for a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on IL: “Officer safety” here didn’t justify a search because of an alleged “furtive gesture” where defendant was quiet and compliant

NY1: Voluntariness shown by experience with criminal justice system and advice of right to refuse; handcuffs removed before consent granted

“Defendant, who had prior contacts with the criminal justice system, provided his consent to search both orally and in writing, and he acknowledged that he had been notified of his right to refuse consent …. Although a large number of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on NY1: Voluntariness shown by experience with criminal justice system and advice of right to refuse; handcuffs removed before consent granted